Cases 61 - 70 of 123
Mitchell v. West Springfield, Town of
as 3:2014cv30142
Plaintiff:
Thomas Mitchell
Defendant:
West Springfield, Town of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones et al v. Eli Lilly and Company et al
as 2:2011cv00349
Plaintiff:
George Vercher, Cynthia Petrie, Robert Jones and others
Defendant:
Endo Pharmaceuticals Holdings, Inc., Teva Biopharmaceuticals, Inc., Vintage Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Branch v. Timothy M. O'Brien and Levin, Papantonio, Thomas, Mitchell, Rafferty & Proctor, P.A.
as 4:2014cv00147
Plaintiff:
Karen Branch
Defendant:
Timothy M. O'Brien and Levin, Papantonio, Thomas, Mitchell, Rafferty & Proctor, P.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Markman et al v. Howmedica Osteonics et al
as 0:2014cv02811
Plaintiff:
Karen Markman and Thomas Mitchell
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics, Stryker Corp., Stryker Sales Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mitchell v. Polacsek
as 3:2014cv00452
Plaintiff:
Thomas Mitchell
Defendant:
Martha E. Polacsek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mantooth v. Henderson et al
as 4:2014cv00149
Plaintiff:
Harold James Mantooth
Defendant:
Brandon Henderson, Cordovi, Phinazee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Mouthorp et al
as 9:2014cv00681
Plaintiff:
Thomas Mitchell
Defendant:
Mouthorp, Gokey and D. Uhler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v Lear Combined Pension Plan
as 3:2013cv00137
Plaintiff:
Thomas Mitchell
Defendant:
Lear Combined Pension Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
mitchell
as 3:2013cv00136
Plaintiff:
thomas mitchell
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Overton v. Crews
as 4:2013cv10172
Petitioner:
Thomas Mitchell Overton
Respondent:
Michael D. Crews
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
