Cases 61 - 70 of 230
Javado Thompson v. M. Nichols, et al
as 16-11236
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAVADO AUDRIC THOMPSON
Defendant - Appellee:
M. NICHOLS, ARNP and W. D. RUMMEL, MD CHO
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00984
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
RUIZ v. RUMMEL et al
as 3:2016cv00017
Petitioner:
Carlos Ruiz
Respondent:
W. D. Rummel, Nichols and RODRIGO VIVAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michele A. Dobson et al v. State of California et al
as 2:2015cv09648
Defendant:
Di Linda Bossenmeyer, Kelly Callahan, Camp Fire Wrap USA and others
Plaintiff:
D. T. W., Michele A Dobson and M W. D
Taylor et al v. Kelly et al
as 2:2015cv00188
Plaintiff:
Rickey T Taylor, De'Marion D Robinson, Julius Johnson and others
Defendant:
Wendy Kelly, Marshall Dale Reed, Gaylon D Lay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
W & D Crane Rentals, LLC v. Big Iron Crane & Trucking, LLC et al
as 6:2015cv00437
Plaintiff:
W & D Crane Rentals, LLC
Defendant:
Big Iron Crane & Trucking, LLC and Big Iron Trucking, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Nichols v. McInnes et al
as 6:2015cv00969
Plaintiff:
Carl James Nichols
Defendant:
Kristy D McInnes, Christopher A Holman, Larry E Berger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matthew Thompson v. John Long, et al
as 15-14676
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MATTHEW JOHN THOMPSON
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN LONG, AWP ASSISTANT WARDEN, DAWN SMITH, HSA MEDICAL SERVICE DIRECTOR, EBONY O. HARVEY, II SC and others
Devandal Thomas v. Prison Health Services, Inc., et al
as 15-14341
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEVANDAL BERNARD THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INC., MARSHA NICHOLS, Correctional Nurse, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Henton v. Miller
as 1:2015cv01620
Petitioner:
W D Henton
Respondent:
Michelle Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
