Cases 61 - 70 of 209
Kleinman v. Pivotal Software, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv03605
Defendant:
Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Pivotal Software, Inc., William Blair & Company, L.L.C. and others
Plaintiff:
Peter Kleinman
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Omdahl v. Farfetch Limited et al
as 1:2019cv08657
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jeff Omdahl
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Aberdeen City Council v. Under Armour, Incorporated
as 19-2032
Defendant / Appellee:
MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INCORPORATED, PNC CAPITAL MARKETS, LLC, BYRON K. ADAMS, JR. and others
Defendant:
BRAD DICKERSON and ANTHONY W. DEERING
Plaintiff:
MONROE COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM, BEN STENGER, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, BRIAN BREECE, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BUCKS COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT FUND, ABERDEEN CITY COUNCIL, as Administrating Authority for the North East Scotland Pension Fund and BUCKS COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT FUND, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Petitioner:
WILLIAM DENT, BERNARDO MEDELLIN, SACRAMENTO CITY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM and others
Leah Bitar v. REV Group Inc et al
as 2:2018cv01268
Defendant:
Justin Fish, Jean Marie Canan, REV Group Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Leah Bitar, Ramanitharan Rajaram and Seth Marinoff
Petitioner:
Houston Municipal Employees Pension System
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
City of Birmingham Firemen's and Policemen's Supplemental Pension System v. Plains All American Pipeline, L.P.
as 4:2015cv02404
Plaintiff:
City of Birmingham Firemen's and Policemen's Supplemental Pension System, Police and Fire Retirement System of the City of Detroit, IAM National Pension Fund and others
Defendant:
Plains All American Pipeline, L.P., Gregory L. Armstrong, Al Swanson and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Plains GP Holdings L.P., Harry N. Pefanis, Victor Burk and others
Petitioner:
Inter-Marketing Group USA, Inc., The Pennsylvania State Employees' Retirement System, Houston Municipal Employees Pension System and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Austin Myers v. Wells Fargo Securities, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv05245
Defendant:
DOES 1 through 50, inclusive and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC
Plaintiff:
Austin Myers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Allen v. Freedom Mortgage Corporation et al
as 5:2019cv00563
Respondent:
Ginnie Mae, Department of Veterans Affairs, Wells Fargo Securities LLC and others
Defendant:
Freedom Mortgage Corporation
Plaintiff:
Cody Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
West Palm Beach Firefighters' Pension Fund v. Conagra Brands, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01323
Defendant:
Anil Arora, Ruth Ann Marshall, Wells Fargo Securities, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
West Palm Beach Firefighters' Pension Fund
Petitioner:
Miami Police Relief & Pension Fund, Electrical Workers Pension Fund, Local 103, I.B.E.W., City of Plantation Police Officers Pension Fund and others
York County on Behalf of the County of York Retirement Fund et al v. Rambo et al
as 5:2019cv00994
Defendant:
Citigroup Global Markets Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Lebenthal & Co., LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Mid-Jersey Trucking Industry & Local No. 701 Pension Fund, York County on Behalf of the County of York Retirement Fund and City of Warren Police and Fire Retirement System
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Alaska Electrical Pension Fund v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 1:2019cv01796
Defendant:
Citigroup Global Markets Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Alaska Electrical Pension Fund, PUERTO RICO GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES AND JUDICIARY RETIREMENT SYSTEMS ADMINISTRATION and Police Retirement System of St. Louis
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
