Cases 61 - 70 of 118
HENSLEY v. COLVIN
as 4:2013cv00139
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM DEAN HENSLEY
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Sayer et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv17806
Plaintiff:
Peggy J. Sayer and William Dean Sayer
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sayer et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:13-cv-17806
Plaintiff:
Peggy J. Sayer and William Dean Sayer
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. and C.R. Bard Inc.
United States of America v. $40,173.25 in United States Currency et al
as 2:2013cv00026
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$40,173.25 in United States Currency and $40,000.00 in United States Currency
Claimant:
William Dean Hyatt
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 841
Williams v. City of New York et al
as 1:2012cv05153
Defendant:
City of New York, Detective William Dean, John and Jane Does 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Marlon Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barbara McCorkle, et al v. TVA
as 12-5505
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BARBARA MCCORKLE and WILLIAM DEAN MCCORKLE
Defendant - Appellee:
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
Deans v. South Carolina Department Mental Health et al
as 3:2012cv00662
Plaintiff:
William Deans
Defendant:
South Carolina Department Mental Health, Dr Wadman and Brooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
In re: William Pfeiffer
as 12-1208
Movant:
In re: WILLIAM DEAN PFEIFFER
Respondent:
THOMAS BIRKETT, Warden
Maschek v. Valdez et al
as 3:2011cv00369
Plaintiff:
Spencer Maschek
Defendant:
Philip Valdez, Norma Rodriguez, Christopher Rose and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Deans v. MaGile et al
as 3:2011cv01584
Plaintiff:
William Deans
Defendant:
John MaGile and South Carolina Dept Mental Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
