Cases 61 - 70 of 12,794
Williams v. Rankins, Woods
as 1:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Wendy Williams
Defendant:
Sylvia Rankins, Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03329
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Maines v. The People of the State of Colorado et al
as 1:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Marsha Lambert Maines
Defendant:
The People of the State of Colorado and LexisNexis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe et al v. Rees
as 3:2024cv00274
Defendant:
Jonathan Rees, Greg Ellis, Johnathan Rees and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe, John Doe, II, John Doe, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
ARACHNE, LLC et al v. SLICKLEN et al
as 2:2024cv05343
Plaintiff:
ARACHNE, LLC and SOPHIA WOJCZAK
Defendant:
ELLEN SLICKLEN and CONAIR LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Stile Societa Cooperativa v. Brickman et al
as 1:2024cv11040
Plaintiff:
Stile Societa Cooperativa
Defendant:
Howard Brickman and Brickman Consulting
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Grenell v. Troye
as 1:2024cv00646
Plaintiff:
Richard Grenell
Defendant:
Olivia Troye
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
Harris v. United States
as 5:2024cv00229
Plaintiff:
Bobby Leon Harris, Jr.
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy to interfere with Civil Rights
Jonathan Gould v. JP Morgan Chase Bank NA, et al
as 24-1704
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN GOULD
Defendant:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK NA and JP MORGAN CHASE & CO
RE Carroll Management Company v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.
as 24-1342
Plaintiff:
RE CARROLL MANAGEMENT COMPANY, CIP CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, CARROLL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT US, LLC and others
Defendant:
DUN & BRADSTREET, INCORPORATED, DUN & BRADSTREET HOLDINGS, INC. and THE DUN & BRADSTREET CORPORATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
