Cases 71 - 80 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03205
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Mahoud v. Williams et al
as 2:2026cv00864
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Abdalla Mahoud
Defendant:
Brian Williams, Jeremy Bean, Julie Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03207
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Vaughn v. Orvis et al
as 2:2026cv02089
Plaintiff:
Eric Vaughn
Defendant:
Jennifer Orvis, Felicia Adkins, Claire Mullis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03182
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv05283
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03130
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
HARRIS VAUGHN v. COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2026cv02881
Plaintiff:
THEREASA ILENE HARRIS VAUGHN
Defendant:
COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS CORPORATION and TRIZETTO PROVIDER SOLUTIONS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00091
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Dennis Ball-Bey v. Kyle Chandler
as 26-1419
Plaintiff:
Dennis Ball-Bey
Defendant:
Kyle Chandler, Police Officer, in his individual capacity, Ronald E. Vaughn, Police Officer, in his individual capacity, Samuel Dotson, III, Former Police Chief and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
