Cases 71 - 80 of 4,714
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00198
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Rocio Munoz v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2024cv01820
Plaintiff:
Rocio Munoz
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles, Jusuf Kassis, Officer Reyes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Batres Munoz, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1344
Petitioner:
SONIA DEL CARMEN BATRES MUNOZ, JAIR HUMBERTO SANTOS BATRES and NATALY JOSEFA SANTOS BATRES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Gray-Waters v. Audi Dallas et al
as 3:2024cv00548
Plaintiff:
Matilda L Gray-Waters
Defendant:
Audi Dallas, Brandon Hunter, Eric Munoz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
(SS) Munoz v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00269
Plaintiff:
Dianna Munoz
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Harp et al v. Sig Sauer, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
Colton Harp, Tamra Marie Harp, Ray Tillotson and others
Defendant:
Sig Sauer, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Moran-Munoz v. Garland et al
as 3:2024cv00373
Petitioner:
Javier Moran-Munoz
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, Ronald L. Davis, Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Lovos-Vasquez, et al v. Garland
as 24-9503
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO LOVOS-VASQUEZ, ROCICELA STEFANY MUNOZ-PEREZ and DIEGO LOVOS-MUNOZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Collazo-Munoz v. Jacquez
as 3:2024cv00337
Petitioner:
Jaime Collazo-Munoz
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Munoz v. Wal-Mart Transportation, LLC
as 4:2024cv00642
Plaintiff:
Jorge Munoz
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Transportation, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
