Cases 71 - 80 of 577
Hoye v. McClure et al
as 5:2022cv00071
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Hoye
Defendant:
Marcus McClure, Tracey McDonald, Lee Simon and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv01180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
John Creamer v. James Lynch, et al
as 22-2174
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN W. CREAMER
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES P. LYNCH, JOHN GREER, DIANE WILSON and others
Andrew Moret v. Kate Brown, et al
as 22-35424
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW GUY MORET
Defendant / Appellee:
KATE BROWN, STATE OF OREGON, OREGON DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Jones v. Hillman, et al
as 22-1256
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GERALD JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY S. HILLMAN, SIDNEY HANLON, SIDNEY KEATON-WALKER and others
Reaves v. Davidson et al
as 4:2022cv01142
Plaintiff:
Kathy J. Reaves and Kathy Juanita Reaves
Defendant:
William H. Davidson, II, Davidson, Wren & DeMasters, P.A., South Carolina Div. of Motor Vehicles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(HC) Wren v. Federal District Court
as 2:2022cv00589
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Charles Wren
Respondent:
Federal District Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00629
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Andrew Moret v. Kate Brown, et al
as 22-35016
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW GUY MORET
Defendant / Appellee:
KATE BROWN, STATE OF OREGON, OREGON DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Andrew Moret v. Kate Brown, et al
as 22-35018
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW GUY MORET
Defendant / Appellee:
KATE BROWN, STATE OF OREGON, OREGON DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
