Cases 71 - 80 of 100
PATRICK BURNETTE et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2026cv05962
Unknown:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
HARRISON PATRICK BURNETTE and ESTATE OF PEGGY BURNETTE
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA) INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv03503
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv00442
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Burnett v. Tanner et al
as 5:2026cv11623
Plaintiff:
Michael Angelo Burnett
Defendant:
J. Tanner, E. Herbert, C. Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Coleman et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2026cv00855
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Coleman, Neal Adams, Jonathan Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Lamont et al v. WeDriveU, Inc.
as 3:2026mc80158
Plaintiff:
Andrea Lamont, Lela Burnett and Mary Parker
Defendant:
WeDriveU, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Lamont et al v. WeDriveU, Inc.
as 3:2026cv04715
Defendant:
WeDriveU, Inc. and Diamond Transportation Services, Inc
Plaintiff:
Andrea Lamont, Lela Burnett and Mary Parker
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Allison v. Burnette, et al.
as 26-3103
Plaintiff:
FRANCIS WILLIAM ALLISON
Defendant:
DEREK BURNETTE, UNKNOWN JU, named as Dr. Ju, Mercy Gilbert Hospital, CORECIVIC, INC., Medical and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv03300
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
