Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 34,604
Cook v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv00187
Plaintiff: Ashley Reshe Cook
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Brooks v. Roman et al
as 2:2024cv00982
Plaintiff: Shane Donavan Brooks
Defendant: Roman, Chet Rigney, Tasheena Sandoval Cooke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Martin v. Kwame Raoul, et al
as 24-1915
Plaintiff: DAVID MARTIN
Defendant: KWAME RAOUL, GREGORY EMMETT AHERN, JR., COUNTY OF COOK and others
Palato v Cook et al
as 3:2024cv00523
Plaintiff: Fred Palato
Defendant: Michelle Cook, Deputy Nathan K Jones, Deputy Tyler R Giebeig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
YOUNGDALE v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2024cv00868
Plaintiff: KIRK YOUNGDALE
Defendant: COOK MEDICAL, INC. IVC FILTERS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Tabitha McKenzie v. Mary Barton, et al
as 24-11653
Plaintiff: TABITHA MCKENZIE
Defendant: MARY BARTON, JAMES SKIPPER, JOHNSON and others
(PS) Bisi et al v. Cooke et al
as 2:2024cv01444
Plaintiff: Gregory Bisi and Laurie Bisi
Defendant: Scott Cooke and Toyota Financial Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Strong #834816 v. Unknown Party et al
as 1:2024cv00528
Plaintiff: Christopher Strong #834816
Defendant: Unknown Party, Unknown Cook, Unknown Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lim v. Eckert et al
as 4:2024cv00470
Plaintiff: Khor Chin Lim
Defendant: Susan Lynn Eckert, City of Chicago, Illinois, Lucien Wong and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Lim v. Committee of Bar Examiners of State Bar of California et al
as 4:2024cv00469
Plaintiff: Khor Chin Lim
Defendant: Committee of Bar Examiners of State Bar of California, City of Chicago, Illinois, Lucien Wong and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?