Cases 71 - 80 of 104
Hausken v. Lewis et al
as 3:2014cv05514
Plaintiff:
Phillip Burton Hausken
Defendant:
Daniel Lewis, Department of Corrections and Marc Glazer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Daniel Tubb
as 14-5697
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DANIEL LEWIS TUBBS
Rankin v. Majikes et al
as 3:2014cv00699
Plaintiff:
James Rankin
Defendant:
John Majikes , Scott Hine , Joseph Zigler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel Lewis v. Ray Hobb
as 14-1512
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Daniel Lewis
Defendant - Appellee:
Ray Hobbs
Hausken v. Warner et al
as 3:2014cv05072
Plaintiff:
Phillip Burton Hausken
Defendant:
Bernard Warner, Monroe Correctional Complex Superintendent, LaFreniere and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2013cv27058
Plaintiff:
Christina Lewis and Scott Daniel Lewis
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LEWIS et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2013cv06159
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LEWIS , DANIELLE LEWIS , JOHNNIE HARRIS and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, RIDDELL, INC., ALL AMERICAN SPORTS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lewis et al v. National Football League et al
as LAE/2:13-cv-06056
Plaintiff:
Michael Lewis , Danielle Lewis , Johnnie Harris and others
Defendant:
National Football League , Riddell, Inc. , All American Sports Corporation and others
Lewis et al v. National Football League et al
as 2:2013cv06056
Plaintiff:
Michael Lewis , Danielle Lewis , Johnnie Harris and others
Defendant:
National Football League, Riddell, Inc, All American Sports Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bennett v. Gordy et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2013cv00625
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lewis Bennett, III
Defendant:
Christopher Gordy , U.S. Marshals Service and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
