Cases 71 - 80 of 123
Perry v. Charleston Area Medical Center, Inc.
as 2:2013cv13598
Plaintiff:
Rachel E. Perry
Defendant:
Charleston Area Medical Center, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 USC 2601: Family & Medical Leave Act of 1993
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00500
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Perry v. The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
as 4:2013cv01039
Petitioner:
William E. Perry
Respondent:
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perry v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv05792
Plaintiff:
Consuelo E. Perry
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. , Mentor Worldwide LLC , Coloplast A/S and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Perry v. Defense et al
as 2:2013cv00441
Petitioner:
Shirley E Perry
Defendant:
U S Dept of Defense and Eugene Perry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property
Perry v. Defense et al
as 1:2013cv00441
Petitioner:
Shirley E Perry
Defendant:
U S Dept of Defense and Eugene Perry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property
Kelton M Williams v. American Specialty Health Group et al
as 2:2013cv00144
Defendant:
American Specialty Health Group, Phyllis W Cheng, Karrie Maeda and others
Plaintiff:
Kelton M Williams
Williams v. Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH) et al
as 3:2013cv00038
Plaintiff:
Kelton Williams
Defendant:
Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH), Phyllis W. Cheng, Olophius E. Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv
USA v. Douglas Perry, Jr.
as 12-16249
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DOUGLAS E. PERRY, JR.
Brown v. Williams et al
as 5:2012cv02180
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Brown, Jr.
Defendant:
Annalisa Williams, Glyniss Miller , Howard R. Vaughn, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
