Cases 71 - 80 of 100
Rorke-Giorgi et al v. Ulta Beauty, Inc.
as 2:2026cv03086
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Rorke-Giorgi and Lorena Morazan
Defendant:
Ulta Beauty, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Non-Motor Vehicle
Peele v. Campos, II et al
as 1:2026cv00473
Plaintiff:
Cassandra Peele
Defendant:
Joseph H. Campos, II, Esera Esera, Elizabeth Saga-Pataia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Brown v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2026cv00709
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Brown
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Mullen v. Chevron et al
as 3:2026pq01187
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Mullen
Defendant:
Chevron and Syngenta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv11596
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jones v. NewRez, LLC et al
as 8:2026cv03567
Defendant:
Howard N. Bierman, NewRez, LLC doing business as Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing, BWW Law Group, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Destenee Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Pink v. Harpe, et al
as 26-7060
Plaintiff:
LO'RE PINK, AKA Johnny L. Hardeman
Defendant:
STEVEN HARPE, ELIZABETH SCHLUTER, R. GULBERT and others
Russo v. Scarlett et al
as 3:2026cv09979
Plaintiff:
Vincent Russo
Defendant:
John A. Scarlett, James Ziegler, Gaurav Aggarwal and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Wilkie et al v. United States of America,
as 4:2026cv00293
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Wilkie and Kyndyll McGarvey
Defendant:
United States of America,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Lopez v. Wall
as 2:2026cv02939
Plaintiff:
Michael Lopez
Defendant:
Roechel Elizabeth Wall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
