Cases 71 - 80 of 153
Everly Hatfield v. USA
as 17-3402
Petitioner - Appellant:
EVERLY K. HATFIELD
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Everly v. Everly et al
as 3:2017cv01440
Plaintiff:
Isaac Donald Everly
Defendant:
Patrice Y. Everly , Phillip J. Everly , Christopher Everly and others
Counter_plaintiff:
Everly and Sons Music (BMI) , Christopher Everly , Patrice Y. Everly and others
Counter_defendant:
Isaac Donald Everly
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101
Thomas et al v. State of Maryland et al
as 8:2017cv01739
Plaintiff:
Christopher Thomas and Alexandra Curbelo
Defendant:
State of Maryland , Larry Hogan , Anne Arundel County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Everly Hatfield v. USA
as 17-1983
Petitioner:
EVERLY K. HATFIELD
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Montes v. Chiquita Brands International Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00157
Defendant:
Chiquita Brands International Inc
Plaintiff:
Montes, Angela Maria Henao Montes, Aura Maria Ocampo Ocampo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Everly et al v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2017cv01752
Plaintiff:
Terrence Everly and Patricia Everly
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lomeli v. Midwest Arbor Corporation et al
as 1:2016cv06817
Plaintiff:
Ismael Lomeli
Defendant:
Midwest Arbor Corporation and Bruce Everly
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Pruter v. Local 210's Pension Trust Fund
as 16-733
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Janet Pruter, Raymond Marques, John Artates and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Local 210's Pension Trust Fund and Local 210, International Brotherhood of Teamsters
Everly et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv15717
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Everly and James Everly
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Everly Hatfield v. USA
as 15-3600
Petitioner:
EVERLY K. HATFIELD
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
