Cases 71 - 80 of 117
Benjamin Gonzalez v. James McDonald
as 14-71901
Petitioner:
BENJAMIN GONZALEZ
Respondent:
JAMES MCDONALD
McDonald et al v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc et al
as 6:2014cv01367
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc , Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc , Takeda Development Center Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
James McDonald and Averill McDonald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ALEXANDER et al v. FOCUS FIBER SOLUTIONS, L.L.C. et al
as 5:2014cv01681
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY ALEXANDER , CHAD ALLRED , CHARLES BILLS and others
Defendant:
FOCUS FIBER SOLUTIONS, L.L.C., BEACON ENTERPRISE GROUP, INC., CMK RESOURCE GROUP L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Brown v. Detroit, City of et al
as 2:2014cv10812
Defendant:
Detroit, City of, Ronald Hopp, James McDonald and others
Plaintiff:
Eddie Lee Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDonald et al v. Allstate Insurance Company
as 1:2013cv06701
Defendant:
Allstate Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Frances McDonald and James McDonald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4001 National Insurance Flood Act
PAGUAY v. JERSEY DEVELOPMENT, L.L.C. et al
as 3:2013cv06980
Plaintiff:
MANUEL PAGUAY
Defendant:
JERSEY DEVELOPMENT, L.L.C. and JAMES MCDONALD
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
McDonald et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2013cv23565
Plaintiff:
Dawn M. McDonald and James McDonald
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McDonald et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as WVS/2:13-cv-23565
Plaintiff:
Dawn M. McDonald and James McDonald
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
McDonald v. Billings et al
as 1:2013cv11161
Defendant:
Richard Billings , Scott Saunders , Robert Sawtelle and others
Plaintiff:
James McDonald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
WHEELER v. IMBODEN et al
as 3:2013cv02577
Plaintiff:
MIKELL WHEELER
Defendant:
SCOTT IMBODEN, DOUGLAS BAYLOR and JAMES MCDONALD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
