Cases 71 - 80 of 497
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00708
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
KING v. SAUL
as 1:2020cv02758
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Plaintiff:
DAVID L. KING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
King v. United States of America et al
as 4:2020cv02363
Respondent:
Michael Carvajal, Warden Michael Phillips, United States of America and others
Petitioner:
Karl L. King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
King v. Phillips
as 1:2020cv02164
Respondent:
Warden Michael Phillips
Petitioner:
Karl L. King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
King v. Miller et al
as 2:2020cv01386
Defendant:
John Doe and JC Miller
Plaintiff:
Robert L King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv08056
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2020cv01280
Defendant:
John Doe and J.C. Miller
Plaintiff:
Robert L King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
King v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2020cv00049
Plaintiff:
Daphne L. King
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Rahman et al v. King et al
as 1:2020cv03617
Defendant:
TRANS-PORTE, INC., INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A US FOODS AND US FOODS, INC., ANTHONY L. KING and Trans-porte, Inc. doing business as US Foods doing business as US Foods, Inc.
Plaintiff:
MUKTA RAHMAN and MOKHLESUR RAHMAN
Not Classified By Court:
Frank V. Floriani
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
King v. United Specialty Insurance Co et al
as 3:2020cv01011
Defendant:
United Specialty Insurance Co, Gurjaap S Bindra and A K A L Cargo Inc
Plaintiff:
James L King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
