Cases 71 - 80 of 693
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04676
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Solange v. M&T Bank
as 8:2022cv02999
Plaintiff:
Solange Sol
Defendant:
M&T Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 fr Fed. Question: Fraud
Ryan-Omowale-Felix v. M&T Bank
as 2:2023cv00001
Plaintiff:
Deane Ryan-Omowale-Felix
Defendant:
M&T Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
McClenny Moseley & Associates, PLLC v. M&T Bank Corporation
as 2:2022cv04732
Plaintiff:
McClenny Moseley & Associates, PLLC
Defendant:
M&T Bank Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Charmaine Custis v. Alisa Graves, et al
as 22-3079
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARMAINE CUSTIS
Defendant / Appellee:
ALISA GRAVES, District/Area Manager, M&T BANK, AARON EVANS, Vice President/Branch Manager and others
Anderson v. State of California et al
as 1:2022cv01391
Plaintiff:
Mayumi Anderson
Defendant:
State of California, Ernest J Licalsi, Thomas J Holthus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Custis v. Graves et al
as 1:2022cv01220
Plaintiff:
Charmaine Custis
Defendant:
Alisa Graves, M & T Bank, Aaron Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Vargas et al v. M&T Bank
as 7:2022cv00361
Plaintiff:
Olga Vargas and Rosendo Vargas
Defendant:
M&T Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01398
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Miken Construction Company, Inc. v. Safeguard Properties, LLC., et al.
as 1:2019cv01308
Defendant:
Dovenmuhle Mortgage, Inc., Nationstar Mortgage, LLC dba Mr. Cooper, CitiMortgage, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Miken Construction Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
