Cases 71 - 80 of 179
Rogers v. Miller
as 19-2525
Defendant / Appellee:
P.O. Andrew Ho, 79th Precinct, P.O. Jamaal Miller, Shield#18339, 79th Precinct, City of New York and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael Rogers
Defendant:
New York Police Department and 79th Precinct, (NYPD)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv15752
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daily v. Rogers
as 2:2019cv04127
Plaintiff:
Timothy Demont Daily
Defendant:
Michael Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aaron Rogers v. Sheriff Rusty Hierholzer, et al
as 5:2019cv00724
Plaintiff:
Aaron Michael Rogers
Defendant:
Sylvia Foraker and W.R. "Rusty" Hierholzer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v Hierholzer
as 5:2019cv00681
Respondent:
Sheriff Rusty Hierholzer
Petitioner:
Aaron Michael Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Timothy Johnson v. Michael Rogers, et al
as 19-1366
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, TROY RIGGS, in his official capacity as Chief of the Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department and MICHAEL ROGERS, individually and in his offical capacity as an Officer for the Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIMOTHY JOHNSON
Yates v. United States of America
as 3:2019cv05151
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Michael Roger Yates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
CAV Farms, Inc. v. Nicholas et al
as 6:2019cv06088
Defendant:
Rogers Cattle Farms, LLC, Michael Rogers, Lynn Hottle and others
Plaintiff:
CAV Farms, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Andreula v. Keryx Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01721
Defendant:
Kevin J. Cameron, Daniel P. Regan, Keryx Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
John Andreula
Van Hulst v. Keryx Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01656
Defendant:
Kevin J. Cameron, Daniel P. Regan, Keryx Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Shawn Van Hulst
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
