Cases 71 - 80 of 91
Morelock v. Astrue
as 5:2012cv06054
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Donald Morelock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Lynch v. Barrett, et al
as 12-1222
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NICK LYNCH
Defendant - Appellant:
ADAM BARRETT, STEPHEN KENFIELD, MICHAEL MORELOCK and others
Defendant:
ABBEGAYLE DORN
Morelock v. SRA Associates, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00110
Plaintiff:
Almond D Morelock
Defendant:
SRA Associates, Inc. , LeAnn Semerna , Alayna Clifton and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Randi Laferney v. The Citizens Bank of East Tenn, et al
as 12-5296
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDI LAFERNEY
Defendant - Appellee:
THE CITIZENS BANK OF EAST TENNESSEE, TERRY MORELOCK and WILLIAM E. PHILLIPS
Laferney v. The Citizens Bank of East Tennessee et al
as 2:2011cv00293
Defendant:
The Citizens Bank of East Tennessee , Terry Morelock and William E Phillips
Plaintiff:
Randi Laferney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pilch v. Jean et al
as 5:2011cv00360
Plaintiff:
Donna M. Pilch
Defendant:
Katherine Jean , Melissa Brumback and Fred Morelock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Lynch v. Barrett et al
as 1:2011cv01120
Plaintiff:
Nick Lynch
Defendant:
Adam Barrett , Stephen Kenfield , Michael Morelock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv03498
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Laferney v. The Citizens Bank of East Tennessee et al
as 2:2010cv00169
Defendant:
The Citizens Bank of East Tennessee, Terry Morelock and William E. Phillips
Plaintiff:
Randi Laferney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morelock v. E. I. Du Pont Nemours and Company et al
as 1:2010cv00179
Plaintiff:
Joel R. Morelock, Sr.
Defendant:
E. I. Du Pont Nemours and Company , Meadowbrook Corporation, Matthiessen & Hegeler Zinc Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
