Cases 71 - 80 of 551
BOLIN v. GARLAND et al
as 1:2022cv02311
Plaintiff:
PAUL C. BOLIN
Defendant:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ROB BONTA and RACHAEL NEWCOMB
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 2:2022cv05059
Plaintiff:
Morganne Mease, Trenashia Jones, Rayna Moses and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Jones et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 1:2022cv00848
Plaintiff:
Morganne Mease, Trenashia Jones, Rayna Moses and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Jones et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
as DE/1:22-CV-00848
Plaintiff:
Jones, Morganne Mease, Trenashia Jones and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Partridge v. Pelle, et al
as 22-1186
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RYAN PARTRIDGE
Defendant / Appellee:
JOE PELLE, BRUCE HAAS, JEFFREY GOETZ and others
Newcomb v. United States Postal Service et al
as 2:2022cv11269
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
William James Newcomb
3Rd Party Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Defendant:
United State of America and Robert Anthony McGuire
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02155
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Ingram v. Kautz, et al
as 22-1083
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL RAY INGRAM
Defendant / Appellee:
T. KAUTZ, JANE DOE, R.N. whose true name is unknown, K. NEWCOMBE and others
Glatz v. Newcomb et al
as 3:2022cv00093
Plaintiff:
Glenn Fred Glatz
Defendant:
Ronald Crockett Newcomb, James Bruce Dunn, Tony Lynn Tarwater and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Causey v. Newcomb
as 4:2021cv01240
Plaintiff:
Douglas Eugene Causey
Defendant:
Robert Alston Newcomb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
