Cases 71 - 80 of 113
Boost Worldwide, Inc. v. Oprah Beauty and Fashion, Inc.
as 2:2011cv02320
Plaintiff:
Boost Worldwide, Inc.
Defendant:
Oprah Beauty and Fashion, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Knox v. Sockey, et al
as 11-7054
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONE L. KNOX
Defendant - Appellee:
W.A. SOCKEY, Dentist, AMANDA WORKMAN, Dental Assistant, CHESTER MASON, Health Service Administrator and others
KELLY-BROWN et al v. WINFREY et al
as 2:2011cv04360
Plaintiff:
SIMONE KELLY-BROWN and OWN YOUR POWER COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
Defendant:
OPRAH WINFREY, HARPO PRODUCTIONS, INC. , HARPO, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
David Whitehead v. President William Clinton, et al
as 11-2408
Plaintiff - Appellant:
David Louis Whitehead
Defendant - Appellee:
President William Jefferson Clinton, President George W. Bush, President Barack Obama and others
Hill v. Keesler Air Force et al
as 1:2011cv00225
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Hill
Defendant:
Keesler Air Force, Memorial Hospital, Garden Park Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3731 Fraud
Tifanny Gouch v. Harpo Entertainment Group et al
as 2:2011cv03539
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Gouch
Defendant:
Harpo Entertainment Group and Oprah Winfrey
Whitehead v. Clinton et al
as 4:2011cv04031
Plaintiff:
David Louis Whitehead
Defendant:
William Jefferson Clinton, George W. Bush, Barrack H. Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv04202
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MUNIZ v. BUZZEO et al
as 2:2010cv07257
Plaintiff:
ANGEL MUNIZ
Defendant:
JOHN BUZZEO, JOHN DOE, ROGER AILES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRIS et al v. WINFREY et al
as 2:2010cv05655
Plaintiff:
CHARLES HARRIS and UNIQUE PRODUCTS AND SERVICES
Defendant:
OPRAH WINFREY and THE OPRAH WINFREY SHOW
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
