Cases 71 - 80 of 107
Lynn v. State of California
as 2:2013cv01657
Plaintiff:
Robert Lynn
Defendant:
State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Robert Clay v. State of North Carolina
as 13-7213
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT LYNN CLAY
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Baker et al v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv01227
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Baker and Robert Lynn Baker
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Chappelle v. Albemarle District Jail et al
as 5:2013ct03019
Plaintiff:
Jason J Chappelle
Defendant:
Albemarle District Jail, Robert Lynn Wood and Taurus Jordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Case Opened in Error
as 4:2013cv00017
Defendant:
Albemarle District Jail, Robert Lynn Wood and Taurus Jordan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
CLAY v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2012cv01010
Petitioner:
ROBERT LYNN CLAY
Respondent:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wesley v. Weirich et al
as 2:2012cv02771
Plaintiff:
Courtney Wesley
Defendant:
Amy P. Weirich, William Oldham, J. Robert Carter, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SUTTON et al v. LANGFORD, et al
as 2:2012cv04999
Plaintiff:
SHERIDAN SUTTON and IYANA SUTTON
Defendant:
PAUL H. LANGFORD , RANDALL NEBLETT, WILLIAM JOYCE and others
Cross_claimant:
PHILADELPHIA OIC, INC.
Cross_defendant:
ROBIN BABONE, HYLTON, WILLIAM JOYCE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnett v. Barnett et al
as 2:2012cv00372
Plaintiff:
Robert Lynn Barnett
Defendant:
Ellen Jane Simon Barnett , Retha Patton , Lawrence F Counts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McGary v. City of Holly Hill, Florida
as 6:2012cv01139
Plaintiff:
Robert Lynn McGary
Defendant:
City of Holly Hill, Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
