Cases 71 - 80 of 207
Spivey v. Clark et al
as 5:2017cv00188
Plaintiff:
Robert Daniel Spivey
Defendant:
Chadrick Clark, Juan Rodriguez and Robert Grant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniels et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2017cv04992
Plaintiff:
Robert Daniels and Vicki Daniels
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Raf Strudley, et al v. Santa Cruz County Bank, et al
as 17-17233
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAF STRUDLEY, individually and as trustee of the Charles Strudley Estate, RUTH STRUDLEY, MATTHEW HANSEN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SANTA CRUZ COUNTY BANK, JOHN GERINGER, CHRISTOPHER A. LUCK and others
Team Marketing Group Inc et al v. Hyde et al
as 5:2017cv01389
Plaintiff:
Team Marketing Group Inc and World Class Marketing Services L L C
Defendant:
Budget Mobile L L C , Budget Prepay Inc and Robert Daniel Hyde, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Taylor v. Villegas et al
as 6:2017cv00135
Plaintiff:
Charles Kevin Taylor
Defendant:
Art Villegas , Terry Smith , Robert Daniel Dismuke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MidFirst Bank v. Daniels et al
as 4:2017cv00757
Plaintiff:
MidFirst Bank
Defendant:
Robert Daniels, Cora Daniels and Robert Swanson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Daniels v. STATE OF GEORGIA
as 1:2017cv00172
Petitioner:
ROBERT DANIELS
Respondent:
STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jazzmon Edmundson v. City of Atlanta, et al
as 17-13200
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAZZMON EDMUNDSON
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF ATLANTA, JUSTIN LOCKE, DEMETRIUS JONES and others
Team Marketing Group, Inc. et al v. Hyde et al
as 3:2017cv01045
Plaintiff:
Team Marketing Group, Inc. and World Class Marketing Services, LLC
Defendant:
Robert Daniel Hyde and Budget Prepaid, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TAYLOR v. USA
as 4:2017cv00115
Petitioner:
ROBERT DANIEL TAYLOR
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
