Cases 71 - 80 of 100
US v. Gordon Swartz, IV
as 25-6474
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
GORDON LLOYD SWARTZ, IV
Funaro v. City of Glens Falls et al
as 1:2025cv00706
Defendant:
City of Glens Falls, Glens Falls Police Department, Hunter McKenna and others
Plaintiff:
David J. Funaro, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Swartz v. Jeffreys
as 8:2025cv00375
Petitioner:
Anthoney E. Swartz
Respondent:
Rob Jeffreys
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bates v. Swartz
as 1:2025cv01115
Petitioner:
Robert Bates
Respondent:
Warden Michael Swartz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv04354
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132 Americans with Disabilities Act - Discrimination
Ohio Justice and Policy Center v. Chambers-Smith et al
as 1:2025cv00291
Plaintiff:
Ohio Justice and Policy Center
Defendant:
Annette Chambers-Smith, Cynthia Davis, Warden George Fredrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wagoner-Swartz v. Walmart Inc et al
as 1:2025cv00205
Plaintiff:
Erica Wagoner-Swartz
Defendant:
Walmart Inc, Wal-Mart Stores East LP, Walmart Claims Services Inc and others
Pretrial Service:
Mark Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Swartz v. Jeffreys
as 8:2025cv00303
Petitioner:
Anthoney E. Swartz
Respondent:
Rob Jeffreys
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Isaac Naranjo v. George Little, et al
as 25-1733
Plaintiff:
ISAAC NARANJO
Defendant:
GEORGE M. LITTLE, TABB BICKELL, STEPHEN BUZAS and others
Nix v. Franklin County et al
as 2:2025cv00327
Plaintiff:
Delshaun R Nix
Defendant:
Franklin County, Ron O'Brien, James L Lowe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
