Cases 71 - 80 of 662
Charles Talbert v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 22-1813
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES TALBERT
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and TOM WOLF
HAYNES v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv05410
Plaintiff:
TALBERT HAYNES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETLY LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00144
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00145
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Bowman v. Ankenbrandt, et al.
as 1:2022cv00155
Plaintiff:
Bowman
Defendant:
Ankenbrandt, Ahlm, Dart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haynes v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2022cv00836
Plaintiff:
Talbert Haynes
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Coatney v. Wright et al
as 5:2022ct03120
Plaintiff:
Talbert Dean Coatney
Defendant:
Sheriff Ennis Wright, Major Adams and Nurse S. Locklear
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pannell v. Southern Regional Jail and Correctional Center
as 5:2022cv00145
Plaintiff:
Talbert Pannell
Defendant:
Southern Regional Jail and Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TALBERT v. HARRY et al
as 2:2022cv01115
Petitioner:
CHARLES TALBERT
Respondent:
LAUREL HARRY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Petrie et al v. NEED A PLUMBER? INC.
as 0:2022cv60545
Plaintiff:
Joseph Petrie, James Terry, Larry Puccio and others
Defendant:
NEED A PLUMBER? INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
