Cases 71 - 80 of 139
Bagby v. Staples et al
as 5:2014cv00772
Plaintiff:
Cedric Wayne Bagby
Defendant:
Steve M. Evans, V. Jones, Ms. Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
D&J Optical, Inc. v. Wallace et al
as 1:2014cv00658
Plaintiff:
D&J Optical, Inc.
Defendant:
Tammy Wallace , Debbie Hughes and Enterprise Optical, LLC
Counter_claimant:
Tammy Wallace
Counter_defendant:
D&J Optical, Inc. and Frank V. Jones
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030
Jones v. USA
as 4:2014cv00438
Respondent:
USA
Movant:
Willie V Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
JONES v. COLVIN
as 3:2014cv00154
Plaintiff:
VICTORIA V JONES
Defendant:
CAROLYN W COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Bryant v. Greene County, Alabama et al
as 7:2014cv00519
Plaintiff:
Frank Bryant
Defendant:
Greene County, Alabama , Greene County Commission , Joe Benison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. U.S. Postal Service
as 0:2014cv60714
Plaintiff:
Vanessa V. Jones
Defendant:
U.S. Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jones v. Harrington
as 2:2014cv02046
Petitioner:
Esmon V Jones
Respondent:
Rick Harrington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. Steward
as 2:2014cv02187
Petitioner:
Shannon V. Jones
Respondent:
Henry Steward
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Al-Haqq v. Stirling et al
as 2:2014cv00098
Plaintiff:
Bilal A Al-Haqq
Defendant:
Byran P Stirling, John Pate, McKendly Newton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnes, et al v. Harris, et al
as 14-4002
Plaintiff - Appellant:
J. CANUTE BARNES, W. KING BARNES and ROBERT V. JONES, derivatively on behalf of all similarly situated shareholders of, DBA Barnes Bancorporation
Defendant - Appellee:
CURTIS H. HARRIS, NED H. GILES, DAVID N. BARNES and others
Intervenor - Appellee:
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, as Receiver for, DBA Barnes Banking Corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
