Cases 71 - 80 of 1,317
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02952
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00916
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
VINSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv10331
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ORANDA VINSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Holman et al v. Potts
as 6:2023cv06057
Cross Defendant:
Paula Holman
Plaintiff:
David Vinson
Cross Claimant:
Raquel Potts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Vinson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 1:2023cv01092
Plaintiff:
Rachel M Vinson
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Vinson v. Cook County et al
as 1:2023cv02730
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE VINSON
Defendant:
COOK COUNTY and Officer Jimenez, Star No. 467
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Naramore et al v. City of Jasper, Alabama
as 6:2023cv00531
Plaintiff:
Eric Naramore, Kenneth Adam Miller, Terri Fields and others
Defendant:
City of Jasper, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Bailey v. Correll et al
as 0:2023cv01636
Plaintiff:
Donald Dean Bailey and Donald Dean Bailey, Sr.
Defendant:
Officer Joseph Correll, Present Police Chief John Doe, Officer John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
CONLEY v. HEARD et al
as 1:2023cv00084
Plaintiff:
KARRI MICHELLE CONLEY
Defendant:
DAVID LEE HEARD, ROBERT SEAN HOLDAWAY, SR, SALVATORE MIRANTI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vinson v. USA
as 3:2023cv00523
Petitioner:
James Vinson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
