Cases 81 - 90 of 558
Hardymon v. Kent et al
as 1:2022cv00724
Plaintiff:
Shane J Hardymon and Shane J. Hardymon
Defendant:
Sheriff Scott M. Kent, Board of Commissioners of Crawford County, Ohio, Sergeant Tyson Estrada and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
M.A. v. City of New York et al
as 1:2022cv03159
Plaintiff:
M.A. by his mother and legal guardian, M.Q. and M.A.
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK, JEWEL CUMMINGS, RICARDO SALINAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harmon v. Dunbar
as 1:2022cv00962
Petitioner:
Theodore R. Harmon, Theodore Roosevelt Harmon and Ted
Respondent:
Warden Dunbar, Associate Warden M.A. Delafoisse, HSA K. Nolte and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01549
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-586
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00074
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Porter v. Regents of the University of Colorado, The et al
as 1:2022cv00335
Plaintiff:
Whitney Porter, M.A. and Whitney Porter
Defendant:
THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO, a body corporate, VENKATESHWAR VENKAT REDDY, Venkateshwar Reddy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Elverd et al
as 2:2022cv00031
Petitioner:
Derek Elverd and M.A. Elverd
Plaintiff:
M.A. Elverd, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
DeCory v. Noem
as 5:2022ct03016
Plaintiff:
William M.A. DeCory
Defendant:
Kristi Noem, Merrick B. Garland, Joe Biden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Burch v. Stancil
as 4:2021cv01992
Plaintiff:
Petrick L Burch
Defendant:
M.A. Stancil
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
