Cases 81 - 90 of 10,162
Metzler v. Luger
as 0:2022cv03212
Plaintiff:
Brian Metzler
Defendant:
Andrew M. Luger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Imiracle (HK) Limited v. Dru House of Vape and Smoke, LLC et al
as 0:2022cv62395
Plaintiff:
Imiracle (HK) Limited
Defendant:
Dru House of Vape and Smoke, LLC doing business as Dru House of Vape and Smoke, Misty Lea Thomas and Andrew M. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Obregon v. Buesgen
as 2:2022cv01513
Petitioner:
Andrew M Obregon
Respondent:
Chris Buesgen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TODD v. RYAN RAMAEL TODD ESTATE et al
as 2:2022cv04777
Plaintiff:
RONNIE RAMAEL TODD
Defendant:
RYAN RAMAEL TODD ESTATE, Not Named Graham Estate, CHRISTINE RIDLEY ESTATE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01421
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
KING v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2022cv00929
Plaintiff:
ANDREW M. KING
Defendant:
TERRY JOHNSON, RAHEEM ALEEM, OFFICER HERBIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PNC BANK, N.A. v. Demos
as 2:2022cv14387
Defendant:
Andrew M Demos and ANDREW M. DEMOS, DMD
Plaintiff:
PNC BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Craig Sakowitz v. Kilolo Kijakazi, et al
as 22-16578
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CRAIG J. SAKOWITZ
Defendant / Appellee:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security
KING v. JOHNSON
as 1:2022cv00855
Plaintiff:
ANDREW M. KING
Defendant:
TERRY JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Frech et al
as 1:2022cv00794
Plaintiff:
Sergio Jemone Brooks
Defendant:
David Frech, Emily Cowan, Melissa A. Reese and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
