Cases 81 - 90 of 363
Carrillo et al v. The Bank of New York Mellon et al
as 3:2019cv02125
Plaintiff:
Christina Carrillo and Armando Carrillo
Defendant:
SPECIALIZED LOAN SERVICING LLC, THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON FKA THE BANK OF NEW YORK, AS TRUSTEE FOR THE CERTIFICATEHOLDERS OF THE CWABS INC., ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2007-10 AND SPECIALIZED LOAN SERVICING, LLC and The Bank of New York Mellon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Valle v. Bank of New York Mellon
as 19-2648
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Nelson Valle
Defendant / Appellee:
The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee Certificate Holder of CWABS, Inc. Asset-Backed Certificate Holders, Servies 2005-4, FKA The Bank of New York and Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.
Bean v. The Bank of New York Mellon, f/k/a The Bank of New York, as Trustee for the Certificateholders of CWABS, Inc. Asset-Backed Certificates Series 2007-2 et al
as 1:2019cv11791
Plaintiff:
Cathleen Bean
Defendant:
Bank of New York Mellon Corp., Orlans PC and The Bank of New York Mellon, f/k/a The Bank of New York, as Trustee for the Certificateholders of CWABS, Inc. Asset-Backed Certificates Series 2007-2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Evans v. Shellpoint Mortgage Services et al
as 2:2019cv00288
Defendant:
The Bank of New York Mellon fka The Bank of New York, as Trustee for the Certificateholders CWABS, Inc. Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2006-21, Shellpoint Mortgage Services aka NewRez LLC, MTC Financial, dba Trustee Corps, a California Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth R. Evans and Kenneth R Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chomo v. CWABS Inc. Asset-Backed Certificates Series 2004-15
as 1:2019cv11754
Plaintiff:
Philip R. Chomo
Defendant:
CWABS Inc. Asset-Backed Certificates Series 2004-15
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Manuel Borobia Benet v. Countrywide Home Loan, Inc., et al
as 19-55939
Defendant / Appellee:
DITECH FINANCIAL LLC, Acting as Attorney-In-Fact for the Bank of New York Mellon FKA The Bank of New York...as Trustee for The Benefit of the Certificate holders of the CWABS, INC., Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2006-8, FKA Greentree Servicing LL, RECONTRUST COMPANY, N.A., a Trustee and Debt Collector for Lender Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., SANDRA E. MEDINA, A Team Member for ReconTrust Company, N.A. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MANUEL BOROBIA BENET
The Bank of New York Mellon v. 886 Park Walk Trust, et al
as 19-16281
Plaintiff / Appellee:
THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, as Trustee for the Certificateholders of The CWABS, Inc., Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2006-4, FKA The Bank of New York
Defendant / Appellant:
886 PARK WALK TRUST
Defendant:
ABSOLUTE COLLECTION SERVICES, LLC and OAK PARK HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION
Antwan Henry v. Ditech Financial, L.L.C., et al
as 19-20439
Defendant / Appellee:
BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, as Trustee for the Certificate Holders of the CWABS, Inc. Assest-Backed Certificates, Series 2006-5, formerly known as Bank of New York, CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES, L.L.C. and DITECH FINANCIAL, L.L.C., formerly known as Green Tree Servicing, L.L.C.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTWAN HENRY
Curtis Randolph v. Bank of America National Association
as 2:2019cv05482
Defendant:
Banc One Capital Markets, Inc., DOES 1-10, Countrywide Financial Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Curtis Randolph
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Smarr v. The Bank of New York Mellon, f/k/a The bank of New York as Trustee for Registered Holders of CWABS, Inc., asset-backed certificates, series 2004-12, c/o Carrington Mortgage Services LLC
as 4:2019cv01807
Defendant:
The Bank of New York Mellon, f/k/a The bank of New York as Trustee for Registered Holders of CWABS, Inc., asset-backed certificates, series 2004-12, c/o Carrington Mortgage Services LLC, The Bank of New York Mellon and The bank of New York as Trustee for Registered Holders of CWABS, Inc., asset-backed certificates, series
Plaintiff:
Charles Smarr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
