Cases 81 - 90 of 136
Humphrey v. Citi Mortgage, Inc.
as 2:2011cv13481
Plaintiff:
Robin Humphrey
Defendant:
Citi Mortgage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Gould v. Citi Mortgage, Inc. et al
as 0:2011cv01982
Plaintiff:
Charles Gould
Defendant:
Citi Mortgage, Inc. , Closers Finalis, Inc., First Rate Financial, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640
Citi Mortgage, Incorporated v. Monica Arndt, et al
as 11-10663
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CITI MORTGAGE, INC.
Defendant - Appellant:
MONICA ARNDT, and All Occupants and RICHARD ARNDT, and All Occupants
Thompson et al v. Citi Mortgage Inc.
as 4:2011cv00676
Plaintiff:
Ronald Carl Thompson and Carol Lynn Thompson
Defendant:
Citi Mortgage Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Citi Mortgage Inc v. Arndt et al
as 3:2011cv01443
Plaintiff:
Citi Mortgage Inc
Defendant:
Monica Arndt and Richard Arndt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Citi Mortgage Inc v. Arndt et al
as 4:2011cv00459
Plaintiff:
Citi Mortgage Inc
Defendant:
Monica Arndt and Richard Arndt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Warner et al v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC et al
as 1:2011cv01547
Plaintiff:
Thomas A. Warner and Paula E. Warner
Defendant:
Nationstar Mortgage, LLC, Citi Mortgage Inc., Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Magdaleno Padilla et al v. Citi Mortgage Inc et al
as 5:2011cv00796
Defendant:
CR Title Services Inc and Citi Mortgage Inc
Plaintiff:
Luz Maria Padilla and Magdaleno Padilla
Ruthfield et al v. National City Mortgage, Inc.
as 5:2011cv00045
Plaintiff:
Ronald Ruthfield and Gail Susan Ruthfield
Defendant:
National City Mortgage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Collins v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00264
Plaintiff:
Jimmy L. Collins
Defendant:
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. , Merscorp , Wilson and Associates PLLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
