Cases 81 - 90 of 111
United States of America v. Jordan et al
as 5:2013cv04089
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Kathryn Mary Jordan, David Jordan, Kansas Housing Resources Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013hc02153
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4248 Civil Commitment of a Sexually Dangerous Person
Local 589, Amalgamated Transit Union et al v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority
as 1:2013cv11455
Plaintiff:
Local 589, Amalgamated Transit Union , Patrick F. Hogan , Timothy C. Brown and others
Defendant:
Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
JORDAN v. CAPOZZA et al
as 2:2013cv00074
Petitioner:
DAVID JORDAN
Respondent:
MARK CAPOZZA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jordan et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv00085
Plaintiff:
Geraldine Jordan and David Jordan
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. , American Medical Systems Holdings, Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Unniebe Solomon et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv05049
Plaintiff:
Allyson Allen, Ethel Caroleen Allen, Earmedine Armfield and others
Defendant:
AstraZeneca PLC, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Does and others
DAVIS v. JORDAN et al
as 2:2011cv05392
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE DAVIS
Defendant:
DAVID JORDAN and SELINA MCMANUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jordan v. Benchmark Permit Services LLC
as 5:2011cv00772
Plaintiff:
David Jordan
Defendant:
Benchmark Permit Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00556
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 794
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
