Cases 81 - 90 of 118
Moore v. Prince et al
as 2:2012cv00855
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Daniel Moore
Defendant:
Howard Prince
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wriston v. Village of LaGrange et al
as 1:2012cv00723
Plaintiff:
Roger L. Wriston
Defendant:
Village of LaGrange , LaGrange Police Department , Daniel Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MOORE et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 2:2012cv00490
Plaintiff:
DANIEL MOORE and KATY MOORE
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , MCNEIL-PPC, INC. , MCNEIL CONSUMER HEALTHCARE DIVISION OF MCNEIL-PPC, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moore v. Coursey et al
as 2:2011cv01545
Defendant:
Superintedant Rick Coursey, Govenor Kitzopher, Ms. Sabota and others
Plaintiff:
Buck Daniel Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Jordet et al
as 3:2011cv01376
Defendant:
Sgt. Artz, H.S. Dr. Carper, H.S. Dr. Digulio and others
Plaintiff:
Buck Daniel Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Studenburg
as 1:2011cv01348
Plaintiff:
Buck Daniel Moore
Defendant:
Philip W. Studenburg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Miller et al
as 2:2011cv01195
Defendant:
Dr. Chase, Mr. Clannon, Mr. Clark and others
Plaintiff:
Buck Daniel Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crittendon v. Westley et al
as 4:2011cv02425
Plaintiff:
Timothy B Crittendon
Defendant:
Mr Westley, Sgt Houston, Ms Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Livingston
as 1:2011cv00428
Petitioner:
Joseph Daniel Moore
Respondent:
Brad Livingston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Moore et al v. County of Brazoria, Texas et al
as 3:2011cv00391
Plaintiff:
William Daniel Moore and Danny Royce Murphy
Defendant:
County of Brazoria, Texas, Mary Cheline Shine, Rodney Garrett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
