Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 151
Global Naps, Inc., et al v. Gangi
as 13-1271
Plaintiff - Appellee: GLOBAL NAPS, INC.
Plaintiff: PPUC PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION, QUALITY SPEAKS, LLC and AMERICAN REGISTRY FOR INTERNET NUMBERS, LTD.
Defendant - Appellee: VERIZON NEW ENGLAND, INC., d/b/a Verizon Massachusetts
Defendant: MA DEPT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS & ENERGY, PAUL B. VASINGTON, in his capacity as Commissioner, JAMES CONNELLY, in his capacity as Commissioner and others
Defendant - Appellant: FRANK T. GANGI
Interested Party: AIR MARYLAND, LLC, BABP, LLC, BROADVOICE, INC. and others
United States v. Shaw We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-3050
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: CHARLES E. SHAW
Global Naps, Inc., et al v. Verizon New England, Inc., et al
as 12-1102
Plaintiff / Appellee: QUALITY SPEAKS, LLC
Plaintiff: GLOBAL NAPS, INC., PPUC PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION and AMERICAN REGISTRY FOR INTERNET NUMBERS, LTD.
Defendant / Appellant: FRANK T. GANGI
Defendant / Appellee: VERIZON NEW ENGLAND, INC., d/b/a Verizon Massachusetts
Defendant: MA DEPT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS & ENERGY, PAUL B. VASINGTON, in his capacity as Commissioner, JAMES CONNELLY, in his capacity as Commissioner and others
Interested Party: CARL F. JENKINS, Receiver, AIR MARYLAND, LLC, BABP, LLC and others
SHAW v. THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2012cv05738
Plaintiff: NORMAN E. SHAW
Defendant: THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA and PRUCO LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Shaw v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv05065
Plaintiff: Jean E. Shaw
Defendant: American Medical Systems, Inc. , American Medical Systems Holdings, Inc. , Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shaw v. United States of America
as 9:2012cv80608
Plaintiff: Carlos E. Shaw
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Global Naps, Inc., et al v. Verizon New England, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-1327
Plaintiff - Appellee: QUALITY SPEAKS, LLC
Plaintiff: GLOBAL NAPS, INC., PPUC PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION and AMERICAN REGISTRY FOR INTERNET NUMBERS, LTD.
Defendant - Appellee: VERIZON NEW ENGLAND, INC., d/b/a Verizon Massachuetts
Defendant: MA DEPT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS & ENERGY, PAUL B. VASINGTON, in his capacity as Commissioner, JAMES CONNELLY, in his capacity as Commissioner and others
Interested Party - Appellant: FRANK T. GANGI
Interested Party - Appellee: CARL F. JENKINS, Receiver
Interested Party: AIR MARYLAND, LLC, BABP, LLC, BROADVOICE, INC. and others
Bowen et al v. Mortgage Electronic Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00059
Plaintiff: Bruce M. Bowen and Mary E. Shaw
Defendant: Mortgage Electronic Systems, Inc., American Mortgage Network, Inc. and Aurora Loan Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Global Naps, Inc., et al v. Verizon New England, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-1102
Plaintiff: GLOBAL NAPS, INC., PPUC PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION, QUALITY SPEAKS, LLC and others
Defendant - Appellee: VERIZON NEW ENGLAND, INC., d/b/a Verizon Massachuetts
Defendant: MA DEPT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS & ENERGY, PAUL B. VASINGTON, in his capacity as Commissioner, JAMES CONNELLY, in his capacity as Commissioner and others
Interested Party - Appellant: FRANK T. GANGI
Interested Party: AIR MARYLAND, LLC, BABP, LLC, BROADVOICE, INC. and others
Interested Party - Interested Party: MICROSOFT CORPORATION
Intervenor: JOSHUA JUSTICE-POPE
McLean v. Shelton et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv01535
Defendant: J. Barton, Marshall Buchholz, Superintendant Coursey and others
Plaintiff: Joseph A. McLean
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?