Cases 81 - 90 of 909
Hill v. Lappin et al
as 3:2011cv02388
Petitioner:
David E Hill
Respondent:
Harley Lappin , B Bledsoe and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gereb v. Nelson et al
as 0:2011cv03608
Plaintiff:
Timothy M. Gereb
Defendant:
Mike Nelson, Shelly Stanton, Nancy Jordan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gereb v. US Attorney General et al
as 3:2011cv03418
Plaintiff:
Timothy M Gereb
Defendant:
US Attorney General, Harley Lappin, G Maldonado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daryl Harper v. Dr. Allen
as 11-7603
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARYL HARPER
Defendant - Appellee:
DR. JEFF ALLEN
Defendant:
HARLEY LAPPIN, TRACY JOHNS, VIRGINIA HARRIS and others
Daughtry v. Lappin et al
as 1:2011cv02210
Plaintiff:
Gil Daughtry
Defendant:
Harley Lappin, Harrell Watts, J.L. Norwood and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McDowell v. Lappin et al
as 3:2011cv02199
Plaintiff:
James McDowell
Defendant:
Harley Lappin, Harrell Watts, J.L. Norwood and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Zebrowski v. United States Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2011cv00164
Plaintiff:
David Zebrowski
Defendant:
United States Federal Bureau of Prisons, Harley Lappin, R.E. Holt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BLANCHARD v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2011cv00306
Defendant:
J. BEIGHLEY, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, DIRECTOR HARLEY LAPPIN and others
Plaintiff:
RAY BLANCHARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bevil v. Lappin et al
as 0:2011cv00117
Plaintiff:
Craig Larry Bevil
Defendant:
Harley Lappin, ERIC HOLDER, Newton E. Kendig and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BOOTH v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2011cv00294
Plaintiff:
SHAUN K. BOOTH
Defendant:
H.G. CHURCH, JOYCE K. CONLEY, T.K. COZZA-RHODES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
