Cases 81 - 90 of 100
Eddie Ingram v. DS Services of America, Inc. et al
as 2:2026cv01226
Plaintiff:
Eddie Ingram
Defendant:
DS Services of America, Inc., John Sandoval and Does 1 through 20, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Scott v. Bowles, et al.
as 1:2026cv00331
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Scott
Defendant:
K. Bowles, M. Gill, Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ingram v. Bisignano
as 3:2026cv00225
Plaintiff:
Ali S. Ingram
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Ingram v. Melwood, Inc.
as 8:2026cv00405
Plaintiff:
Wesley Ingram
Defendant:
Melwood, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00012
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Tribe Express, Inc. et al v. Ingram's Towing Services, Inc
as 3:2026cv00083
Plaintiff:
Tribe Express, Inc., Tomahawk Truck Sales LLC and Tribe Leasing LLC doing business as Cherokee National
Defendant:
Ingram's Towing Services, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Conversion
Taylor v. Ingram
as 2:2026cv00193
Plaintiff:
Jermel Arcilicia Taylor
Defendant:
C/O T. Ingram
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Bowles et al
as 7:2026cv00070
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Scott
Defendant:
K. Bowles, M. Gill, C.O. Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
INGRAM v. PFIZER INC et al
as 3:2026cv00549
Plaintiff:
NATASHA LYNETTE INGRAM
Defendant:
PFIZER INC, PHARMACIA & UPJOHN CO LLC and PHARMACIA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ingram v. Edge et al
as 3:2026cv00210
Petitioner:
Terry Ingram
Respondent:
Charisma Edge and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
