Cases 81 - 90 of 1,705
Lee v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01233
Plaintiff:
James Lee
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
United States v. James Thompson
as 24-1547
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
James Lee Thompson
Brent v. Cain
as 24-60044
Petitioner:
James Lee Brent
Respondent:
Burl Cain, Commissioner, Mississippi Department of Corrections
Huffman v. Powell et al
as 7:2024cv00110
Plaintiff:
James Lee Huffman
Defendant:
Mjr. Leslie Powell and Middle River Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United African-Asian Abilities Club et al v. Villa Pacific Properties, LP et al
as 3:2024cv00202
Plaintiff:
United African-Asian Abilities Club and James Lee
Defendant:
Villa Pacific Properties, LP and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Primes v. Locklear
as 5:2024ct03024
Plaintiff:
James Lee Primes
Defendant:
Mary Locklear
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Polk v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv00147
Petitioner:
James Lee Polk
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
US v. Rasheed Muhammad
as 24-4130
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
RASHEED ABDULLAH MUHAMMAD, a/k/a James Lee Johnson
United African-Asian Abilities Club et al v. 13919 Coteau Partners, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00689
Plaintiff:
United African-Asian Abilities Club and James Lee
Defendant:
13919 Coteau Partners, LLC and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
United African-Asian Abilities Club et al v. St. George Manor, L.P. et al
as 3:2024cv00392
Plaintiff:
United African-Asian Abilities Club and James Lee
Defendant:
St. George Manor, L.P. and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
