Cases 81 - 90 of 94
WARREN v. 3M, ET AL.
as 2:2008cv76114
Plaintiff:
JAMES WARREN
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
White v. TX Dept of Pub Sfty, et al
as 08-10274
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CRAIG WHITE
Defendant - Appellee:
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, Lubbock Office, JAMES WARREN, CULPEPPER and others
Malone v. Gallagher, et al
as 08-10110
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK DEWAYNE MALONE
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGE GALLAGHER, JAMES WARREN ST JOHN and DANIEL L YOUNG
WARREN v. OWENS-ILLINOIS
as 5:2008cv67714
Plaintiff:
JAMES WARREN
Defendant:
OWENS-ILLINOIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
WARREN v. OWENS-ILLINOIS
as 5:2008cv67715
Plaintiff:
JAMES WARREN
Defendant:
OWENS-ILLINOIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Dana L Webb v. Lori Hunt Kennedy et al
as 5:2007cv00660
Defendant:
Does, Lori Hunt Kennedy, Joan E Louw and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
US exrel Wilson etal v. Kellogg Brown
as 07-1516
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel. David L. Wilson, ex rel. James Warren
Defendant - Appellee:
KELLOGG BROWN AND ROOT, INCORPORATED, KBR, INCORPORATED, KELLOGG BROWN & ROOT SERVICES, INCORPORATED and others
Rodgers et al v. Baker et al
as 1:2007cv00185
Plaintiff:
William Rodgers and Domingo Ramirez
Defendant:
James Warren Baker, James Warren Baker, Mid Plains Holdings LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Capaiu v. Schriro et al
as 2:2007cv00458
Petitioner:
James Warren Capaiu
Respondent:
Dora Schriro and Arizona Attorney General, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
