Cases 81 - 90 of 309
Woods v. Annucci et al
as 9:2020cv00570
Defendant:
Jill Grant, John or Jane Does 11-15, Joseph Bellnier and others
Plaintiff:
Lee Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FOWLER v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 5:2020cv00171
Defendant:
JOHN OR JANE DOE 1, CAPTAIN DAVIS, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL LEWIS FOWLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00674
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv10279
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Florez v. Ash et al
as 2:2020cv02050
Defendant:
John or Jane Doe 7, John or Jane Doe 4, John or Jane Doe 1 and others
Plaintiff:
Jesus Florez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Danny Wise v. USA, et al
as 20-15102
Defendant:
MAY, POTENZA, BARAN, AND GILLESPIE PC, SCOTTSDALE POLICE DEPARTMENT, UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as John Does (6) and Jane Does (6), federal agents and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANNY WISE
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Doe #6 v. Choice Hotels International, Inc. d/b/a Comfort Inn
as 4:2019cv04993
Defendant:
CHOICE HOTELS INTERNATIONAL, INC. d/b/a COMFORT INN and Choice Hotels International, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jane doe #6
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jane Doe 1, et al v. Howard University
as 19-7163
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 3, Jane Doe 2 and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Howard University
Leeling et al v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv03551
Defendant:
Jane Doe #7, John Doe #5, Jane Doe #8 and others
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Leeling and Tony Leeling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Isa et al v. Shah et al
as 4:2019cv04459
Defendant:
Noorul Hassan, Syed Aminullah Hussaini, Syed Turab Shah and others
Plaintiff:
ICCMC and Nawaid Isa
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
