Cases 81 - 90 of 91
Hill v. Frizzell et al
as 1:2010cv01385
Plaintiff:
Jason Harry Hill
Defendant:
. Frizzell, Frellheimer, Livingston County Animal Control and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Anderson et al v. Keystone RV Company et al
as 2:2010cv03148
Plaintiff:
Yvette Anderson , Shelia Lane , James Lane and others
Defendant:
Keystone RV Company, Bechtel National, Inc and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Easterling et al v. Gulf Stream Coach, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00346
Plaintiff:
Lydia Easterling , Gary Anderson , Henry Coleman, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Gulf Stream Coach, Inc., Bechtel National, Inc. and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anderson et al v. Keystone RV Company et al
as 1:2010cv00382
Plaintiff:
Yvette Anderson , Mack Anderson, Jr. , Sheila Lane and others
Defendant:
Keystone RV Company, Bechtel National, Inc. and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marshall v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv03137
Plaintiff:
Timothy Marshall
Defendant:
The City of New York, Donald Perrone and Jason Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Bradshaw
as 5:2009cv02544
Petitioner:
Jason Harris
Respondent:
Margret Bradshaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Holloway et al v. Lott et al
as 4:2008cv00821
Plaintiff:
Charmmorcus Holloway, Sr, Emmanuel Doc Scott and Mashan Lee
Defendant:
Wes Lott, Jason Harris, Macrice Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Elder et al v. Williamson
as 3:2008cv03102
Plaintiff:
John C Elder, IV, Shone Foster, Jason Harris and others
Defendant:
Neil Williamson
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
USA v. Harris
as 08-30054
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JASON HARRIS, a.k.a. Jason Van Pelt
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 07-2018
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
