Cases 81 - 90 of 97
Smith et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv08523
Plaintiff:
Verna Bennett Smith and Joel Smith
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Carbajal, et al v. Warner, et al
as 13-1139
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEAN CARBAJAL and VICTORIA CARBAJAL
Defendant - Appellee:
CAROL WARNER, Chief of Probation for the Seventh Judicial District , in her individual capacity, DAVID ROMERO, Superior probation Officer for the Seventh Judicial District, in his individual capacity, JOE QUINTANA, Probation Officer for the Seventh Judicial District, in his individual capacity and others
Elizah Sheppard v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc., et al
as 12-1937
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ELIZAH SHEPPARD
Defendant - Appellee:
CVS PHARMACY, INC.
Defendant:
JOEL SMITH, named as Prevention Officer Joel Smith and DOE, Unknown parties named as et al
Murray v. Westbrooks et al (TVR)
as 2:2012cv00052
Plaintiff:
Cory Murray
Defendant:
Bruce Westbrooks, Officer Bontrager, Burt Boyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murray v. Westbrooks et al
as 1:2012cv00133
Plaintiff:
Cory Murray
Defendant:
Bruce Westbrooks, Officer Bontrager, Burt Boyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Durm v. Lewis et al
as 3:2011cv00352
Plaintiff:
Jake W Durm
Defendant:
Randy Lewis, G Linebaugh, Dennis Slatton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Elizah Sheppard v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc., et al
as 11-1708
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ELIZAH SHEPPARD
Defendant - Appellee:
CVS PHARMACY, INC., JOEL SMITH, named as Prevention Officer Joel Smith and DOE, Unknown parties named as et al
Keith v. Meyer et al
as 2:2011cv14121
Plaintiff:
Oren M. Keith
Defendant:
Kristin Meyer, Joel Smith, Brint Black and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henry v. Hancock County, MS Official et al
as 1:2010cv00245
Plaintiff:
Joseph Henry
Defendant:
Hancock County, MS Official, Bay St. Louis, MS Police Dept., Jerry O. Terry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
