Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 262,216
OWENS et al v. ROBERTSON, ANSCHUTZ, SCHNEID, CRANE & PARTNERS, PLLC et al
as 1:2024cv07142
Defendant: ONITY GROUP INC., PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION, ROBERTSON, ANSCHUTZ, SCHNEID, CRANE & PARTNERS, PLLC and others
Plaintiff: CLARENCE E. OWENS and FRANCES ROGERS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00820
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Tate v. Montgomery
as 24-3802
Petitioner: LIONEL TATE, SR.
Respondent: WARREN L. MONTGOMERY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-2259
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Jason Krumback v. Teresa Bittinger, et al
as 24-2254
Petitioner: Jason Krumback
Respondent: Teresa L. Bittinger, Warden and Attorney General for the State of South Dakota
Ollison v. James et al
as 4:2024cv00526
Plaintiff: Melvin L Ollison, Jr
Defendant: Darryl James, Jr, Fenisha Moton, Fred Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. Woods et al
as 4:2024cv00529
Plaintiff: Norris B Howard, Sr
Defendant: Lafayette Woods, Jr, Jimmy Hudson, Joseph Gorman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Slaughter v. Louisiana State Employees Retirement System et al
as 2:2024cv01595
Plaintiff: Ralph Slaughter
Defendant: Louisiana State Employees Retirement System, Unidentified Parties, John L Weimer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02700
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Shackleford v. RBT Transportation et al
as 2:2024cv02421
Plaintiff: Rabian Shackleford
Defendant: RBT Transportation, K.T.G. USA, Inc. and Robert L Ruth, Jr.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?