Cases 81 - 90 of 110
Brown v. Radar et al
as 2:2015cv00238
Plaintiff:
Christopher Brown
Defendant:
Keith Radar, Alexandria Cobb, Lori Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2015cv00170
Plaintiff:
Christopher Wendell Johnson
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections, Unknown Figueroa and Lori Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaka v. Ryan et al
as 2:2015cv00050
Plaintiff:
Unknown Shaka
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Anthony N Medel, Richard Pratt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv01186
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Elonza Tyler v. Mike Knowles, et al
as 14-15480
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ELONZA JESSE TYLER
Defendant - Appellee:
MIKE KNOWLES and LORI JOHNSON
Elonza Tyler v. Mike Knowles, et al
as 13-17539
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ELONZA JESSE TYLER
Defendant - Appellee:
MIKE KNOWLES and LORI JOHNSON
Gutierrez et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv30461
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. , American Medical Systems Holdings, Inc. , Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
San Juana Gutierrez , Mary E. Bayless , Angelina M. Laningham and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gutierrez et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00358
Plaintiff:
San Juana Gutierrez, Mary E. Bayless, Angelina M. Laningham and others
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc., American Medical Systems Holdings, Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
JOHNSON v. MENTOR WORLDWIDE LLC
as 4:2013cv00296
Plaintiff:
LORI JOHNSON
Defendant:
MENTOR WORLDWIDE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JOHNSON v. MENTOR WORLDWIDE LLC
as GAM/4:13-cv-00296
Plaintiff:
LORI JOHNSON
Defendant:
MENTOR WORLDWIDE LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
