Cases 81 - 90 of 26,515
Arnold-Johnson v. Morris et al
as 4:2024cv00582
Defendant:
James Morris and Rodney Thomas
Plaintiff:
Diamond Arnold-Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Morris v. Davis et al
as 4:2024cv00878
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Morris, III
Defendant:
Unknown Davis and Participating Officers On Duty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blanchard v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv01928
Defendant:
Lt Cavon, John/Jane Doe 4, Jeffery Olsen and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio L Blanchard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
John Doe et al v. John Doe et al
as 2:2024cv05416
Defendant:
Robert Shiota Dre, Jane Doe, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Phillips v. Neilly et al
as 7:2024cv00447
Defendant:
David Morris, Dennis Gardner, Amy Neilly and others
Plaintiff:
Douglas B. Phillips, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv07316
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Mitchell et al v. Sproul et al
as 3:2024cv01886
Plaintiff:
Morris Mitchell, Thomas Toomers and Rodney Garder
Defendant:
Lieutenant Moon, Captain Moorehead, D. Sproul and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Burgess et al
as 5:2024cv04079
Plaintiff:
Clayton Jay Martin
Defendant:
Richard Burgess, Jr., J. Colin Reynolds, Rita Sunderland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sullivan v. Hartford Financial Services Group, et al
as 24-3114
Defendant:
TWIN CITIES FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, DR. EDWARD PROSTIC, DR. STEPHEN NOLKER and others
Plaintiff:
SCOTT B. SULLIVAN
Maupin et al v. EMA Construction LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00350
Plaintiff:
Terry Maupin and Erik Maupin
Defendant:
Shawn J. Morris and EMA Construction LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
