Cases 81 - 90 of 340
HISEL v. LAWRENCE COUNTY CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2021cv00935
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH M. HISEL
Defendant:
LAWRENCE COUNTY CORRECTIONS and PRIME CARE MEDICAL INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Harris v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2021cv01380
Defendant:
T. Jones, Sergeant E. Strawderman, State of Maryland and others
Plaintiff:
Travon Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BREHM v. JOHNSTOWN POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 3:2021cv00121
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER SHANE BREHM
Defendant:
JOHNSTOWN POLICE DEPARTMENT, DETECTIVE BRADLEY CRIST, THE CITY OF JOHNSTOWN OF PA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kiser v. West Virginia Division of Corrections et al
as 2:2021cv00334
Defendant:
Kanawha County Circuit Court, CAMC Hospital, Prime Care Medical and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy L. Kiser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VIRGO v. SHABAZZ et al
as 5:2021cv02518
Defendant:
JOSEPH BIDEN, DOUG WILLIAMS, ALLENTOWN POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff:
VIRGILLIO VIRGO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gregory v. Prime Care Medical Inc.
as 1:2021cv00031
Plaintiff:
Larry T. Gregory, II
Defendant:
Prime Care Medical Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
HOLLIDAY v. PRIME CARE MEDICAL et al
as 5:2021cv00314
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HOLLIDAY
Defendant:
NURSE LEONA, DR KENNETH WLOCHESKI and PRIME CARE MEDICAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gregory v. Prime Care Medical, Inc.
as 3:2021cv00029
Plaintiff:
Larry T. Gregory, II
Defendant:
Prime Care Medical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HISEL v. LAWRENCE COUNTY CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2021cv00117
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH M. HISEL
Defendant:
LAWRENCE COUNTY CORRECTIONS and PRIME CARE MEDICAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
HURDLE v. RUSSELL et al
as 5:2021cv00172
Defendant:
DR. MOLLY LONGACHER, PRIME CARE MEDICAL, KYLE RUSSELL and others
Plaintiff:
RAMELL S. HURDLE and RAMELL SCOTT HURDLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
