Cases 81 - 90 of 16,289
Nathan Randall Beahn v. Martin O Malley
as 8:2024cv01014
Plaintiff:
Nathan Randall Beahn
Defendant:
Commissioner of SS Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Johnson v. Chappius
as 24-1225
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON
Defendant:
Superintendent PAUL CHAPPIUS, Jr., GREGORY KELLER, Deputy Superintendent For Security, Lieutenant TIMOTHY CARROLL and others
KANABLE v. ALLEN et al
as 1:2024cv00771
Plaintiff:
KRIS KANABLE
Defendant:
TRENT ALLEN, HIATT, D. THOMSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Mathena et al
as 7:2024cv00296
Plaintiff:
Michael Derrick Edwards
Defendant:
Randall C. Mathena, Lois Fegan, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Annis v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00549
Plaintiff:
Jay Michael Annis
Defendant:
Wisconsin Department of Corrections, Kevin A Carr, Jared Hoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TETMEYER v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2024cv00762
Plaintiff:
William Tetmeyer, Stefanie Straub and William Harting
Defendant:
City of Indianapolis, Sean Baukat, Trent Fortson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00489
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tafari v. Rucker, et al.
as 24-2842
Plaintiff:
RAS HEZEKIAH TAFARI
Defendant:
YVETTE RUCKER, JULIE RANDALL, GARRY MOLER and others
Annamalai v. BOP et al
as 3:2024cv01207
Plaintiff:
Annamalai Annamalai and Swamiji Sri Selvam Siddhar
Defendant:
BOP, USA, S Holem and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Sladek v. Bank of America, NA, et al
as 24-1181
Plaintiff:
DENNIS SLADEK
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA, NA, a North Carolina corporation, U.S. BANK, a Minnesota corporation, SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, a Utah corporation and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
