Cases 81 - 90 of 100
Mustafa Zeidan v. Costco Wholesale Corporation, et al.,
as 5:2026cv02220
Plaintiff:
Mustafa Zeidan
Defendant:
Costco Wholesale Corporation, Kim Sue and Does 1 through 20, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Duve v. Forrest et al
as 6:2026cv00034
Defendant:
Philip Mujeres, Janet Bates Harrington, William Charles Forrest and others
Plaintiff:
Susan Elizabeth Duve
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Robinson v. Raul Labrador
as 1:2026cv00259
Plaintiff:
Melissa Sue Robinson
Defendant:
Raul Labrador
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Duve v. Forrest et al
as 3:2026cv00158
Defendant:
Philip Mujeres, Janet Bates Harrington, William Charles Forrest and others
Plaintiff:
Susan Elizabeth Duve
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Jenkins et al v.The United State of America
as 3:2026cv00288
Plaintiff:
James G. Jenkins, Sr., Nan Sue Jenkins and Angela Lynne Jenkins
Defendant:
The United State of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2679 Federal Tort Claim
Brueckner v. Gray Local Media, Inc.
as 2:2026cv01717
Plaintiff:
Brandi Sue Brueckner
Defendant:
Gray Local Media, Inc. doing business as WCSC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Briggs v. U.S. Bank Trust National Association
as 3:2026cv01310
Plaintiff:
Mellow Sue Briggs
Defendant:
U.S. Bank Trust National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Teece, et al v. United States Internal Revenue Service, et al
as 26-4049
Plaintiff:
REBECCA SUE TEECE and RICHARD KIMBALL TEECE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY DIVISION OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-5347
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
