Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 225
Nooner v. Miller et al
as 6:2019cv06116
Respondent: Judge J. Leon Holmes, Judge Kristine G. Baker, Judge James M. Moody, Jr. and others
Petitioner: Terrick Nooner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
NOONER v. MILLER et al
as 1:2019cv00338
Defendant: J. LEON HOLMES, JERRY W. CAVANEAU, BETH DEER and others
Plaintiff: TERRICK NOONER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodward v. Vogelsberg et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2018cv03263
Defendant: Mark Krenik, Thomas Ray Jackson, Sam Azure and others
Plaintiff: John Stephen Woodward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ray v. United States of America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv01193
Petitioner: Thomas Ray, III
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Maxwell v. Hardin County Jail et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv00419
Defendant: Danny Allen, Hardin County Jail and R.S. Reynolds
Plaintiff: Thomas Ray Maxwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Daniel Ray We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-50115
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: DANIEL RAY, AKA Popeye, AKA Daniel T. Ray, AKA Daniel Thomas Ray
Thomas Dickerson v. Warden, Jenkins Correctional, et al
as 18-11286
Plaintiff - Appellant: THOMAS RAY DICKERSON
Defendant - Appellee: JENKINS CC WARDEN and WARDEN
DICKERSON v. AUTRY STATE PRISON
as 1:2018cv00034
Plaintiff: THOMAS RAY DICKERSON
Defendant: AUTRY STATE PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RAY v. BRADLEY
as 2:2017cv00532
Respondent: J. BRADLEY
Petitioner: THOMAS RAY, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
RAY v. VAUGHN
as 1:2017cv03961
Petitioner: THOMAS RAY, III
Respondent: A. VAUGHN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?