Cases 81 - 90 of 283
Wingfield v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 3:2020cv00112
Plaintiff:
Edward Wingfield
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
WINGFIELD v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 2:2019cv20765
Plaintiff:
BARBARA WINGFIELD
Defendant:
PROCTER & GAMBLE MANUFACTURING COMPANY, ASTRAZENECA LP, THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY and others
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cunningham v. Geneticare Health Solutions et al
as 4:2019cv00867
Defendant:
Brandon Muzik, Preston Wingfield, Geneticare Health Solutions and others
Plaintiff:
Craig Cunningham
WINGFIELD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03976
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Plaintiff:
JAMES WINGFIELD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michael Greene v. Marvin Plumley
as 19-7286
Defendant / Appellee:
KENNETH M. WINGFIELD, Correctional Officer; Sgt., TIMMY CUTRIGHT, Correctional Officer 2, CECIL PRITT, Unit Manager and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL JERMAINE GREENE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00344
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WINGFIELD v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2019cv16091
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
SHARI WINGFIELD
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gray v. Wingfield et al
as 6:2019cv00063
Defendant:
Sgt. Lawerence, Officer Eric Wingfield, Cpt. Martha Dukes and others
Plaintiff:
James Joseph Brian Gray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wingfield v. Smiths Food & Drug Centers Inc
as 1:2019cv00135
Plaintiff:
Sandra K Wingfield
Defendant:
Smiths Food & Drug Centers Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
