Cases 81 - 90 of 21,990
Woods v. Orum et al
as 3:2024cv00287
Plaintiff:
Jermey Woods
Defendant:
Lucy Orum, L&C Auto Transport, LLC and Prime Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
United States of America v. Velez (Nelson)
as 24-1468
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER NELSON, CARMELO VELEZ, CHRISTOPHER RODRIGUEZ and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Rodriguez et al v. General Motors LLC
as 7:2024cv00218
Plaintiff:
Cassandra Rodriguez and Patrick Woods
Defendant:
General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Wood v. Bank of America , N.A.
as 1:2024cv11430
Plaintiff:
David Wood
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Woods v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv01159
Plaintiff:
Christopher Demetrius Woods
Defendant:
Commissioner of SS Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Wood v. Herrick, MD, MSHA, et al
as 1:2024cv00673
Plaintiff:
James R Wood
Defendant:
Steve Herrick, MD, Alvin Harris, MD, Clarence Friend, MD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans v. Grady County Jail et al
as 5:2024cv00321
Petitioner:
Raymond C Evans
Defendant:
FNU Walker
Respondent:
Grady County Jail, Jim Gorlach, FNU Cade and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Woods v. Bickham
as 24-30246
Petitioner:
Allen Odell Woods
Respondent:
Edward Bickham, Warden, Dixon Correctional Institute
Legacy Recovery Svc v. City of Monroe
as 24-30211
Plaintiff:
Legacy Recovery Service, L.L.C., doing business as Legacy House, Colburn Sullivan, Joe Montgomery and others
Defendant:
City of Monroe, Friday Ellis, individually and in his official capacity as Mayor of Monroe, City Council of Monroe and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
